#Fiction Monday (192) - A shift from a tool to an ideal O trecere de la o unealta la un ideal

This game is hosted by Vinitha Dileep, on her blog  'Reflections' and
I discovered it on Esha's  blog. This time  the  word prompt is 'LAW'.

'Nu confunda legea cu justitia. Justitia este un
ideal si legea este un instrument.'

For several days, all kinds of thoughts about this word have been circulating.
They appear, disappear quickly and again, all in a kind of loop.
But nothing seems to settle into an essence, as I like, from which I can decant solutions.
The law systems are somewhat old. But when you are not part of the process of making
them, it is difficult to truly understand the mechanisms by which they become alive,
that is, applicable.
I have always wondered, when some of them seem strange, as they come out the cuts on my projects, what caused the weirdness?
Partial knowledge of the subject? The impossibility of evaluating the consequences of the application? An indifference and lack of respect towards one's own work and towards the
other people? A certain kind of premeditation, thinking through the prism of interest in a
certain type of effects? Or even a little bit of everything, generating a missed recipe!

Anyway, looking around and looking even further, there seem to be many 'projects' cut crookedly. And yet looking closely at nature, whose laws are so clear and effective, generating
the balance of life, I wonder why so little has been learned from here?
Certainly such a study was not part of the bibliography. I'm starting to wonder if there
are explicit laws of thoughts. As here there is definitely room for improvement.
With a crooked way of thinking, it's hard to come up with fair laws.

'Legea vietii este legea credintei'.

De cateva zile se invart tot felul de ganduri despre acest cuvant. Apar, dispar repede
si iarasi, totul intr-un fel de bucla. Insa nimic nu pare sa se aseze intr-o esenta, asa
cum imi place, din care sa pot decanta si solutii.
Sistemele de legi au ceva vechime. Insa atunci cand nu faci parte din procesul de
realizare a lor, e greu sa intelegi cu adevarat mecanismele prin care devin vii, adica
aplicabile. Mereu m-am intrebat, atunci cand unele par strambe, asa cum imi ies
mie taieturile pe proiecte, ce cauza a generat strambatatea? Cunoasterea partiala
a subiectului? Imposibilitatea evaluarii consecintelor aplicarii? O indiferenta si o lipsa
de respect fata de propria munca si fata de semeni? Un anumit gen de premeditari,
gandite prin prisma interesului fata de un anumit tip de efecte?
Sau chiar din toate cate putin, generand o reteta ratata!

Oricum, uitandu-ma prin preajma si mergand si mai departe cu privirea, par sa fie
multe 'proiecte' taiate stramb. Si totusi privind atent natura, ale carei legi sunt atat de
clare si eficiente, generand  echilibrul vietii,  ma intreb de ce s-a invatat atat de putin
de la ea? Cu siguranta nu  facea parte din bibliografie o astfel de invatatura.  
Incep sa ma intreb daca or exista explicit niste legi ale gandirii. Ca aici cu siguranta
mai este loc pentru imbunatatiri.
Cu o gandire stramba, cam greu sa iasa niste legi drepte!

'Oamenii buni nu au nevoie de legi care sa le spuna sa
actioneze in mod responsabil, in timp ce oamenii rai
vor gasi o cale de a ocoli legile.'

#Fiction Monday (191) - A memory and a conclusion

@@@@@@@@@